Patrick Zahraj vs Mae Malige Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

In comparing the recent second serve performance of both players, Malige has demonstrated a slight edge, winning 44.35% of points on their second serve over the past six months, compared to Zahraj’s 39.97%. This statistic is known to be highly correlated with predicting match outcomes. Additionally, analyzing return game statistics shows Malige surpassing Zahraj, as Malige has won 50.85% of their opponent's second serve points, while Zahraj has claimed 48.84% in recent form.

Moreover, examining the first serve return statistics provides further insight. In this area, Malige leads with a 31.85% success rate in retrieving first serves, whereas Zahraj stands at 27.84%. These figures hold significant weight when determining which player is statistically favored in this head-to-head (H2H) matchup. Under pressure, however, Zahraj displays a marginal advantage by saving 55.38% of breakpoints, contrasted with Malige’s 51.59% in recent performances.

Overall performance in the past year indicates Zahraj has been more successful, securing 58.54% of matches played (W/L 48/34), whereas Malige has won 52.08% (W/L 25/23). This provides a macro perspective on their competitive head-to-head prediction outlook. When considering surface performance, both players excel on indoor hard courts; Malige with a 60% win rate (W/L 31/21), and Zahraj achieving a slightly superior 65% win rate (W/L 39/21).

Level of play is another factor: Malige primarily competes in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments valued at $10K, with a 58.33% win rate (W/L 21/15). Meanwhile, Zahraj appears more on the Challengers/ITF circuit surpassing $10K, winning 61.9% (W/L 26/16). Notably, Zahraj tends to perform better in deciding sets, securing victory in 67% of such instances over the past year, compared to Malige's 40% success rate.

The average ranking of opponents faced over the past year slightly favors Malige, who competes against players ranked 380.35 on average, as opposed to Zahraj’s 398.82. Breakpoint conversion rates also delineate a difference, with Malige converting 38.31% of opportunities compared to Zahraj at 34.77%, a telling statistic for live betting strategies in high-pressure moments.

Based on the analysis of these comprehensive statistics, it suggests that Zahraj may have a slight edge due to their higher win rate and performance in crucial situations, despite Malige's slight superiority in certain serve and return statistics. Therefore, while the stats illustrate a closely contested match, Zahraj is predicted to have the upper hand and potentially emerge victorious in this encounter.